posted on 2022-10-17, 03:14authored byHannah R. Elliott, Kimberley Burrows, Josine L. Min, Therese Tillin, Dan Mason, John Wright, Gillian Santorelli, George Davey Smith, Deborah A. Lawlor, Alun D. Hughes, Nishi Chaturvedi, Caroline L. Relton
Additional file 5. Figure S3. Comparison of effect sizes for cell composition adjustment of EWAS. Each CpG is represented by a point on the graph with 95% confidence intervals for effect estimates. Red dashed line: linear regression between data sets. Black dashed line: line of equality. Orange highlighted estimates: p ≤ 1.03 × 10−7 cell adjusted EWAS (n = 3922/16,344 CpG sites).
Funding
Medical research council British Heart Foundation National Institute for Health Research