Additional file 2: Table S1. of What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach
journal contributionposted on 31.03.2017 by Kirstie Coxon, Alison Chisholm, Reem Malouf, Rachel Rowe, Jennifer Hollowell
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
CASP appraisals. Two reviewers (KC and AC) appraised included papers using the CASP qualitative checklist ( http://www.casp-uk.net/ ). The first reviewer (KC) conducted a full CASP appraisal, and a second reviewer (AC) independently conducted a modified CASP appraisal focusing on the adequacy of reporting, following Carroll et al.’s method . The reviewers resolved areas of disagreement following initial reviews; these were minor and reflected variation in degree to which a paper met a given criteria, rather than conflicting views about the paper. No papers were excluded from the review on the basis of quality. (DOCX 41 kb)