12888_2020_2674_MOESM1_ESM.docx (95.13 kB)
Additional file 1 of Measuring psychopathology as it unfolds in daily life: addressing key assumptions of intensive longitudinal methods in the TRAILS TRANS-ID study
journal contribution
posted on 2020-07-07, 05:05 authored by Marieke J. Schreuder, Robin N. Groen, Johanna T. W. Wigman, Catharina A. Hartman, Marieke WichersAdditional file 1: Table S1. Financial compensation for the diary period. Fig. S1. Outline of the TRAILS TRANS-ID study design. At baseline and post assessment, the following instruments were employed: diagnostic interview (short version of the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry, 23), aggressive behavior subscale of the Adult Self Report (24), Groningse Vragenlijst Sociaal Gedrag (17), List of Threatening Experiences (26). The same instruments will be administered during the follow-up assessment, which was not completed yet at the time of submission. For a subset of 60 participants, the baseline and post assessments were complemented by a qualitative assessment that served to establish the validity of diary items. Table S2. Scores per mini-SCAN domain. Table S3. Descriptives diary items. Table S4. Scoring of the mini-SCAN interview. Table S5. Correlation between mean ratings on diary items and mini-SCAN domains assessed during the post assessment interview. Table S6. Five diary items that correlated most strongly with each psychopathological domain assessed by the mini-SCAN (left: highest Spearman correlation coefficient).