Springer Nature
Browse
13089_2021_242_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (12.8 MB)

Additional file 1 of Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic

Download (12.8 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-09-07, 03:26 authored by Nilam J. Soni, Jeremy S. Boyd, Gregory Mints, Kevin C. Proud, Trevor P. Jensen, Gigi Liu, Benji K. Mathews, Christopher K. Schott, Linda Kurian, Charles M. LoPresti, Phil Andrus, Robert Nathanson, Natalie Smith, Elizabeth K. Haro, Michael J. Mader, Jacqueline Pugh, Marcos I. Restrepo, Brian P. Lucas
Additional file 1: Table S1. Two-day In-person POCUS Course Agenda. Table S2. Four-week Tele-ultrasound POCUS Course Agenda. Table S3. In-person Course Scanning Session Objectives. Table S4. Tele-ultrasound Course Scanning Session Objectives. File S1. Pre- and Post-course Knowledge Test. File S2. CME Course Evaluation. File S3. Tele-ultrasound Course Evaluation. Table S5. Characteristics of Learners and Faculty. Table S6. Tele-ultrasound Course Evaluations by Learners and Faculty. Table S7. Faculty Evaluation of the Tele-ultrasound Course.

Funding

quality enhancement research initiative agency for healthcare research and quality centers for disease control and prevention

History

Usage metrics

    Critical Ultrasound Journal

    Categories

    Keywords

    troubleshoot image acquisitionphysical distancing requirementslikely persist beyondfulfilling learning objectiveseducators seeking guidance87 %; p71 %; ppocus educational curriculumtwo course formatshigher among learnersfelt learners completedcourse test scores6 – 5though mean preultrasound course highlypocus cme courseultrasound pocus coursescare ultrasound trainingperson versus teleultrasound versuscare ultrasoundultrasound coursethough teleresults prerecent preperson coursecourse evaluationscourse administrationultrasound technologyultrasound handsultrasound coursesvirtual lecturestravel restrictionstraining gapsignificant differenceseveral yearsscanning sessionsprovide feedbackpreviously describedfaculty ratedfaculty feedbackdeliver handscommon barrierclinical practice069 ).001 ),

    Licence

    CC BY 4.0

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC