Springer Nature
Browse

Additional file 5 of Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies

Download (17.4 kB)
dataset
posted on 2022-09-06, 03:20 authored by Eva Draborg, Jane Andreasen, Birgitte Nørgaard, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Jennifer Yost, Klara Brunnhuber, Karen A. Robinson, Hans Lund
Additional file 5. Results of data extraction.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326
  2. 2.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5440
  3. 3.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2815%2900307-4
  4. 4.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4501
  5. 5.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2809%2960329-9
  6. 6.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5913
  7. 7.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0010035
  8. 8.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
  9. 9.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2899%2904149-5
  10. 10.
    DOI - References https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2810%2961001-X

Usage metrics

    Systematic Reviews

    Categories

    Keywords

    Systematic reviewEvidence-based researchContext

    Licence

    CC BY + CC0

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC