Additional file 2: of Socio-cultural determinants of physical activity across the life course: a âDeterminants of Diet and Physical Activityâ (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review
datasetposted on 20.12.2017 by Lina Jaeschke, Astrid Steinbrecher, Agnes Luzak, Anna Puggina, Katina Aleksovska, Christoph Buck, Con Burns, Greet Cardon, Angela Carlin, Simon Chantal, Donatella Ciarapica, Giancarlo Condello, Tara Coppinger, Cristina Cortis, Marieke De Craemer, Sara DâHaese, Andrea Di Blasio, Sylvia Hansen, Licia Iacoviello, Johann Issartel, Pascal Izzicupo, Martina Kanning, Aileen Kennedy, Fiona Ling, Giorgio Napolitano, Julie-Anne Nazare, Camille Perchoux, Angela Polito, Walter Ricciardi, Alessandra Sannella, Wolfgang Schlicht, Rhoda Sohun, Ciaran MacDonncha, Stefania Boccia, Laura Capranica, Holger Schulz, Tobias Pischon
Datasets usually provide raw data for analysis. This raw data often comes in spreadsheet form, but can be any collection of data, on which analysis can be performed.
Quality assessment of included systematic literature reviews using the AMSTAR checklist assessing eleven quality criteria. Summarizes the results of the methodological quality assessment of included systematic literature reviews based on a slightly modified version of the AMSTAR checklist [22, 23]. Criterion number 11 originally requires the conflict of interest statement in the SLR as well as in the primary studies; for this umbrella SLR the criterion was fulfilled, if the statement was provided in the SLR. *Criteria 1â11 were scored 0, when the criteria was not fulfilled, not applicable, or could not be answered based on the information provided by the systematic literature review, and 1, when the criteria was applicable for and fulfilled by the included systematic literature review. Sum quality score ranged from 0 to 11. **weak (sum quality score ranging from 0 to 3); moderate (sum quality score ranging from 4 to 7); strong (sum quality score ranging from 8 to 11). (XLSX 11 kb)