Springer Nature
Browse
13014_2019_1357_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (24.2 kB)

Additional file 1: of Creating customized oral stents for head and neck radiotherapy using 3D scanning and printing

Download (24.2 kB)
presentation
posted on 2019-08-20, 12:01 authored by Mohamed Zaid, Nimit Bajaj, Hannah Burrows, Ryan Mathew, Annie Dai, Christopher Wilke, Stephen Palasi, Ryan Hergenrother, Caroline Chung, Clifton Fuller, Jack Phan, G. Gunn, William Morrison, Adam Garden, Steven Frank, David Rosenthal, Michael Andersen, Adegbenga Otun, Mark Chambers, Eugene Koay
Figure S1 A flowchart compares the workflow for the two tested methods; CT images segmentation versus 3D scanning. Figure S2 Unpaired t-test shows a significant advantage for the 3D scanning method compared to CT derived segmentation in terms of reproducibility measured by the average dice coefficient for the 3 observers. Figure S3 Unpaired t-test shows a significant advantage for the ICP registration method over the manual one in terms of time efficiency. (PPTX 54 kb)

Funding

Andrew Sabin Family Foundation

History