Additional file 1: of Are there benefits from using bone-borne maxillary expansion instead of tooth-borne maxillary expansion? A systematic review with meta-analysis
journal contributionposted on 25.02.2019 by Marietta KrĂźsi, Theodore Eliades, Spyridon Papageorgiou
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
Appendix 1. Literature searched conducted to identify eligible studies (last search date September 28, 2018). Appendix 2. Additional information about this review, including deviations from protocol. Appendix 3. List of studies identified from the literature and their inclusion/exclusion status, with reasons. Appendix 4. Details of the expansion appliances used in the included trials. Appendix 5. Risk of bias assessment of included randomized trials. Appendix 6a. List of included trials comparing bone-borne with tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion. Appendix 6b. List of included trials comparing hybrid (tooth-bone-borne) with tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion. (PDF 694 kb)