Springer Nature
Browse

sorry, we can't preview this file

13058_2017_909_MOESM1_ESM.docx (60.91 kB)

Additional file 1: Table S1. of Reproductive profiles and risk of breast cancer subtypes: a multi-center case-only study

Download (60.91 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-11-07, 05:00 authored by Olivier Brouckaert, Anja Rudolph, Annouschka Laenen, Renske Keeman, Manjeet Bolla, Qin Wang, Adelheid Soubry, Hans Wildiers, Irene Andrulis, Volker Arndt, Matthias Beckmann, Javier Benitez, Carl Blomqvist, Stig Bojesen, Hiltrud Brauch, Paul Brennan, Hermann Brenner, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Ji-Yeob Choi, Sten Cornelissen, Fergus Couch, Angela Cox, Simon Cross, Kamila Czene, Mikael Eriksson, Peter Fasching, Jonine Figueroa, Henrik Flyger, Graham Giles, Anna González-Neira, Pascal Guénel, Per Hall, Antoinette Hollestelle, John Hopper, Hidemi Ito, Michael Jones, Daehee Kang, Julia Knight, Veli-Matti Kosma, Jingmei Li, Annika Lindblom, Jenna Lilyquist, Artitaya Lophatananon, Arto Mannermaa, Siranoush Manoukian, Sara Margolin, Keitaro Matsuo, Kenneth Muir, Heli Nevanlinna, Paolo Peterlongo, Katri Pylkäs, Suleeporn Saajrang, Caroline Seynaeve, Chen-Yang Shen, Xiao-Ou Shu, Melissa Southey, Anthony Swerdlow, Soo-Hwang Teo, Rob Tollenaar, Thérèse Truong, Chiu-chen Tseng, Alexandra van den Broek, Carolien van Deurzen, Robert Winqvist, Anna Wu, Cheng Yip, Jyh-Cherng Yu, Wei Zheng, Roger Milne, Paul Pharoah, Douglas Easton, Marjanka Schmidt, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Jenny Chang-Claude, Diether Lambrechts, Patrick Neven
Definitions of breast cancer subtypes that have been applied in previous BCAC manuscripts. Table S2 Number of breast cancer patients with reproductive risk factor data in the 34 BCAC studies assessed in this study. Table S3 Number of breast cancer case patients with tumor marker data in the 34 BCAC studies assessed in this study. Table S4 Distribution of tumor characteristics according to breast cancer subtypes. Table S5 Association between parity (ever versus never) and BC subtypes for age overall and for specific ages (40, 50 and 60 years). Table S6 Frequency table showing parity by subtype and age group. Table S7 Associations between age at menarche, age at FFTP and breast cancer subtypes. The same analysis as in Table 4 is performed but here parity is considered a continuous variable. Table S8 Effect of parity (ever versus never) on BC subtype risk across all ages at BC diagnosis and corrected for BMI. Associations between age at menarche, age at FFTP and breast cancer subtype risk. (DOCX 60 kb)

History