%0 Journal Article %A Black, Caitlin %A Mumby, Hannah %A Henley, Michelle %D 2019 %T Additional file 1: of Mining morphometrics and age from past survey photographs %U https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Additional_file_1_of_Mining_morphometrics_and_age_from_past_survey_photographs/8121005 %R 10.6084/m9.figshare.8121005.v1 %2 https://springernature.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/15139367 %K Body size %K Images %K Morphology %K Hunting %K African elephants %K Loxodonta africana %K Savanna elephant %K Tusk %K Conservation %X Table S1. Welch two sample t-tests compared survey images where main anatomy was not visible (anal flap, foot; scapula; scapula, anal flap; scapula, anal flap, foot;scapula, foot) vs. when either 1) body length, 2) body height, or 3) foot diameter was clearly visible in an image for each of 6 relevant morphometric variables (represented by ratios). A Bonferroni correction indicated that a p value of < 0.005 represents significance. (PDF 17 kb) %I figshare