%0 Generic %A Fu, Shuhua %A Wang, Anqi %A Au, Kin %D 2019 %T Additional file 5: of A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads %U https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Additional_file_5_of_A_comparative_evaluation_of_hybrid_error_correction_methods_for_error-prone_long_reads/7672256 %R 10.6084/m9.figshare.7672256.v1 %2 https://springernature.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/14251964 %K Table S 3. Performance statistics %K performance %K ONT %K error correction methods %K SR coverages %K data %K XLSX 19 kb %X Table S3. Performance statistics on output rate. a. Output rate (%) performance statistics on PacBio data of ten methods using five SR coverages. b. Output rate (%) performance statistics on ONT data of ten methods using five SR coverages. (XLSX 19 kb) %I figshare