%0 Journal Article %A Tian, Lei %A Shi, Shaohua %A Nasir, Fahad %A Chang, Chunling %A Li, Weiqiang %A Tran, Lam-Son %A Tian, Chunjie %D 2018 %T Additional file 4: of Comparative analysis of the root transcriptomes of cultivated and wild rice varieties in response to Magnaporthe oryzae infection revealed both common and species-specific pathogen responses %U https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Additional_file_4_of_Comparative_analysis_of_the_root_transcriptomes_of_cultivated_and_wild_rice_varieties_in_response_to_Magnaporthe_oryzae_infection_revealed_both_common_and_species-specific_pathogen_responses/6168467 %R 10.6084/m9.figshare.6168467.v1 %2 https://springernature.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/11156612 %K Cultivated rice %K Magnaporthe oryzae %K Transcriptome analysis %K RNA-sequencing %K Wild rice %X Table S2. RNA-sequencing and quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) data of the verified genes. The fold-changes shown were obtained from RNA-sequencing and qRT-PCR data derived from C + F vs C comparison and W + F vs W comparison. Red, blue and black colors indicate the up- (fold-changes ≥2 with a q-value < 0.05), down-regulated (fold-changes ≤2 with a q-value < 0.05) and unchanged genes, respectively. The four treatments were non-inoculated cultivated rice (C), cultivated rice inoculated with Magnaporthe oryzae (C + F), non-inoculated wild rice (W), and wild rice inoculated with M. oryzae (W + F). (PDF 54 kb) %I figshare