%0 DATA
%A Yuanyuan, Yu
%A Hongkai, Li
%A Xiaoru, Sun
%A Ping, Su
%A Tingting, Wang
%A Yi, Liu
%A Zhongshang, Yuan
%A Yanxun, Liu
%A Fuzhong, Xue
%D 2017
%T Additional file 8: Figure S7. of The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams
%U https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/Additional_file_8_Figure_S7_of_The_alarming_problems_of_confounding_equivalence_using_logistic_regression_models_in_the_perspective_of_causal_diagrams/5739000
%R 10.6084/m9.figshare.5739000.v1
%2 https://springernature.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/10100484
%K Confounding equivalence
%K Logistic regression model
%K Inverse probability weighting based marginal structural model
%K Simulation study
%K Causal diagrams
%X Scenario 3 (Fig. 1c), simulation results of the bias and standard error of c-equivalence sets A 1 ≈ A 2 when varied across the log transformed odds ratio effect of T on Y, W on X and X on Y. (PDF 27 kb)