Additional file 4: Figure S3. of High-throughput validation of ceRNA regulatory networks
Hua-Sheng Chiu
María Martínez
Mukesh Bansal
Aravind Subramanian
Todd Golub
Xuerui Yang
Pavel Sumazin
Andrea Califano
10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3790885_D4.v1
https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Additional_file_4_Figure_S3_of_High-throughput_validation_of_ceRNA_regulatory_networks/5052169
Genome wide comparison. FC comparison between Hermes, cefinder and random assay selection. Both Hermes and cefinder significantly outperform Random. Hermes outperforms cefinder at P < 5E-07 and P < 2E-44, for MCF7 and PC3, respectively; p-values based on two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests of ceRNA-target fold changes. (PDF 1033 kb)
2017-05-30 05:00:00
ceRNA
microRNA
LINCS
PRAD
BRCA