Additional file 4: Figure S3. of High-throughput validation of ceRNA regulatory networks Hua-Sheng Chiu María Martínez Mukesh Bansal Aravind Subramanian Todd Golub Xuerui Yang Pavel Sumazin Andrea Califano 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3790885_D4.v1 https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Additional_file_4_Figure_S3_of_High-throughput_validation_of_ceRNA_regulatory_networks/5052169 Genome wide comparison. FC comparison between Hermes, cefinder and random assay selection. Both Hermes and cefinder significantly outperform Random. Hermes outperforms cefinder at P < 5E-07 and P < 2E-44, for MCF7 and PC3, respectively; p-values based on two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests of ceRNA-target fold changes. (PDF 1033 kb) 2017-05-30 05:00:00 ceRNA microRNA LINCS PRAD BRCA