%0 Journal Article %A Coxon, Kirstie %A Chisholm, Alison %A Malouf, Reem %A Rowe, Rachel %A Hollowell, Jennifer %D 2017 %T Additional file 2: Table S1. of What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach %U https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Additional_file_2_Table_S1_of_What_influences_birth_place_preferences_choices_and_decision-making_amongst_healthy_women_with_straightforward_pregnancies_in_the_UK_A_qualitative_evidence_synthesis_using_a_best_fit_framework_approach/4806400 %R 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3731083_D2.v1 %2 https://springernature.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/7922653 %K Place of birth %K Systematic review %K Decision making %K Choices %K Women’s views %K Women’s experiences %K Maternity care %K Preferences %X CASP appraisals. Two reviewers (KC and AC) appraised included papers using the CASP qualitative checklist ( http://www.casp-uk.net/ ). The first reviewer (KC) conducted a full CASP appraisal, and a second reviewer (AC) independently conducted a modified CASP appraisal focusing on the adequacy of reporting, following Carroll et al.’s method [1]. The reviewers resolved areas of disagreement following initial reviews; these were minor and reflected variation in degree to which a paper met a given criteria, rather than conflicting views about the paper. No papers were excluded from the review on the basis of quality. (DOCX 41 kb) %I figshare