Additional file 1: Table S1. of Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics JonssonViktor ÖsterlundTobias NermanOlle KristianssonErik 2016 The full area under curve estimates at different group sizes for all 14 methods. Higher values represent higher gene ranking performance. The results are calculated based on 100 resampled metagenomes. The Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test was not evaluated at the smallest sample size (3 + 3) due to lack of samples. (DOCX 14 kb)