%0 Figure %A Heyer, R. %A Benndorf, D. %A Kohrs, F. %A Vrieze, J. %A Boon, N. %A Hoffmann, M. %A Rapp, E. %A Schlßter, Andreas %A Sczyrba, Alexander %A Reichl, U. %D 2016 %T MOESM3 of Proteotyping of biogas plant microbiomes separates biogas plants according to process temperature and reactor type %U https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/figure/MOESM3_of_Proteotyping_of_biogas_plant_microbiomes_separates_biogas_plants_according_to_process_temperature_and_reactor_type/4352660 %R 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3607715_D2.v1 %2 https://springernature.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/7078703 %K Biogas %K Biogas plant %K Anaerobic digestion %K Metaproteomics %K Community function %K Microbial resource management %K MetaProteomeAnalyzer %K Clustering %K Principal component analysis %K Network analysis machine learning %X Additional file 3: Figure S2. Number of identified spectra for each BGP (average of triplicates). Each sample was searched against UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot and UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot including several metagenomes, applying a Mascot score of 40 and a FDR of 1 %. %I figshare