Elke, Gunnar van Zanten, Arthur Lemieux, Margot McCall, Michele Jeejeebhoy, Khursheed Kott, Matthias Jiang, Xuran Day, Andrew Heyland, Daren Additional file 2: Figure A1. of Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Subgroup analysis comparing the effect of enteral versus parenteral nutrition according to the caloric intake on length of intensive care unit stay (Nā€‰=ā€‰4 studies). Panel A shows the subgroup of aggregated trials in which the caloric intake in the PN group was significantly higher than in the EN group, Panel B shows the subgroup of aggregated trials in which the PN and EN groups received similar caloric intake and Panel C including one trial where caloric intake was not reported. CI confidence interval, EN enteral nutrition, M-H Mantel-Haenszel test, PN parenteral nutrition. Figure A2. Subgroup analysis comparing the effect of enteral versus parenteral nutrition on length of hospital stay according to the caloric intake (Nā€‰=ā€‰7 studies). Panel A shows the subgroup of aggregated trials in which the caloric intake in the PN group was significantly higher than in the EN group, Panel B shows the subgroup of aggregated trials in which the PN and EN groups received similar caloric intake and Panel C including one trial where caloric intake was not reported. CI confidence interval, EN enteral nutrition, IV inverse variance, M-H Mantel-Haenszel test, PN parenteral nutrition. (PDF 148 kb) Systematic review;Meta-analysis;Nutrition therapy;Enteral nutrition;Parenteral nutrition;Critically ill;Intensive care unit;Infections;Randomized controlled trial 2016-04-29
    https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Additional_file_2_Figure_A1_of_Enteral_versus_parenteral_nutrition_in_critically_ill_patients_an_updated_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis_of_randomized_controlled_trials/4351544
10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3607376_D1.v1