%0 Journal Article %A Schuppli, Caroline %A Forss, Sofia %A Meulman, Ellen %A Zweifel, Nicole %A Lee, Kevin %A Rukmana, Evasari %A Vogel, Erin %A van Noordwijk, Maria %A van Schaik, Carel %D 2016 %T Additional file 2: Figure S1. of Development of foraging skills in two orangutan populations: needing to learn or needing to grow? %U https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Additional_file_2_Figure_S1_of_Development_of_foraging_skills_in_two_orangutan_populations_needing_to_learn_or_needing_to_grow_/4340783 %R 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3603788_D1.v1 %2 https://springernature.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/7066637 %K Body growth %K Development %K Diet repertoire %K Feeding rates %K Foraging skills %K Life history %K Needing-to-learn hypothesis %K Ranging %K Orangutans %K Skill learning %X Diet repertoire size in relation to follow effort: The number of recorded food items versus the number of hours of follow data collected for the three adult females with the most data available at Tuanan. 500 follow hours correspond to roughly 1 year ( X ¯ $$ \overline{\mathrm{X}} $$  = 13.1 months), the overall observation time was 9.5 years. The total number of plant species recorded for each of these females was 109 – 113 ( X ¯ $$ \overline{\mathrm{X}} $$ =110.3). For insects we only counted termites, ants, bees (honey) and caterpillars as food items and did not distinguish between the different species. Thus, the number of non-plant food items was 4 for each adult female. Figure S2. Development of ramble ratios over age: Average daily ramble ratios versus age for immatures at Suaq and Tuanan. Figure S3. Body size comparisons: Estimated growth trajectories bases on forearm measurements for immatures at Suaq and Tuanan. The solid lines were attained via smoothing functions in R (smooth.spline in the stats package). The horizontal lines show average weaning ages at both populations. The Tuanan data were retrieved from [54]. (DOCX 36 kb) %I figshare